Which step is focused on investigating symptoms of fraud?

The investigative step is centered on examining the symptoms of fraud. During this phase, a fraud examiner delves into specific indicators or red flags that suggest fraudulent activity may be occurring. This involves gathering evidence through interviews, document examinations, and forensic analysis to determine the nature and extent of any fraudulent activities.

Focusing on symptoms is crucial because it allows the investigator to identify potential fraud patterns, gather relevant data, and assess the circumstances surrounding the suspected misconduct. The investigative step is not just about gathering information but analyzing that information to build a case and uncover the truth behind the suspected fraud.

While other options represent important aspects of fraud detection and prevention, they do not specifically emphasize the process of investigating symptoms. The technological step relates to the use of tools and systems that might aid in fraud detection, the analytical step involves evaluating data and trends to observe anomalies, and the proactive step is aimed at preventing fraud before it occurs. Each of these steps plays a role in the overall fraud prevention strategy, but the investigative step specifically targets the symptoms that signal potential fraudulent behavior.